Horrific additional payments for additional costs: massive problems with real estate companies in Göttingen

Horrific additional payments for additional costs: massive problems with real estate companies in Göttingen

According to a report by www.hna.de, tenants in the Grone district of Göttingen are having massive problems with a large real estate company due to horrendous additional payments for additional costs. The landlord LEG, based in Düsseldorf, owns more than 1,000 rental apartments in this district, and the additional charges for additional costs are sometimes extremely high.

The tenants feel overwhelmed and see the apartment blocks as purely speculative objects. The LEG company announced that it would review the additional costs and reduce them if necessary. The company also asked tenants whether they could get support from the state to pay additional costs. However, the tenants fear that the additional costs will ultimately be passed on to the authorities.

The problems have already led to a strong response to the tenants' association in Grone and have also been discussed in the city's public committees. There are plans to address the issue at a public event to provide affected tenants with answers to their questions.

LEG Immobilien is a listed company and holds around 146,000 rental apartments, mainly in North Rhine-Westphalia. According to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, the largest shareholders are two US investment companies. In recent years there have been repeated reports in the media about tenants having problems with this company.

As an expert in the real estate market, I analyze this situation and see potential effects on the housing market. The massive demands for back payments and the tenants' feeling that their apartments are purely objects of speculation could lead to a loss of confidence in the real estate market. This situation could also encourage tenants to increasingly object to service charge notices. This could lead to an increasing burden on the courts and administrative authorities.

In addition, there is a possibility that other real estate companies that engage in similar practices could also face increased opposition from tenants and public authorities. In the long term, this could lead to changes in the regulation and monitoring of the real estate market. The potential consequences of this situation for the real estate market must therefore be taken seriously and require careful observation and analysis.