Climate funds in crisis: Planned funds for certificates instead of protection!
The article sheds light on the dispute over the climate fund, which concerns planned investments in climate protection and emissions certificates.
Climate funds in crisis: Planned funds for certificates instead of protection!
The planned use of the Climate Fund (KTF) is causing controversy in German politics and among climate scientists. The KTF is intended to support investments in a carbon-neutral future, but the Finance Ministry has unveiled plans to use money from this fund to purchase carbon credits. This decision has raised concerns about the fund being misused, which could significantly jeopardize climate protection. Brigitte Knopf, climate scientist and director of the think tank Zukunft Klimasocial, expresses specific concerns that Germany could miss its climate targets.
The KTF plays a central role in financing climate-friendly projects such as the expansion of renewable energies and providing financial relief for households and companies. According to EU regulations, member states are obliged to meet their annual emissions targets. If this is not done, emission certificates must be purchased from other countries. It is estimated that Germany could emit around 224 million tonnes of CO₂ above the permitted limit by 2030, which could cost around 22 billion euros. With a CO₂ price of 100 euros, this would be over 4 billion euros annually.
Political reactions and concerns
There are currently no funds planned in the KTF for the purchase of certificates, as Germany has been far below the permitted CO₂ quantities in recent years. The Federal Ministry of Finance has stated that the financing for the purchase of certificates will be dealt with in future budget preparations. These announcements have sparked criticism from many political actors, particularly in the ranks of the Green Party.
Julia Verlinden from the Greens describes the Finance Ministry's plans as anti-climate protection policy and demands that the responsible ministries should provide the financial resources instead of using the climate fund for this. Andreas Jung from the Union parliamentary group also emphasizes that if there is a risk of missing targets, more should be done for climate protection, not less.
The debate about the climate fund and the handling of emissions certificates will continue to intensify in the coming weeks and months. Given the existing challenges in climate protection and the economic implications, it remains to be seen what measures will ultimately be taken to achieve Germany's climate goals. For more information about the background, read Capital and Mirror.