Financial expert explains: Cottbuser wins in court against Disney because of inadmissible price increases.

Financial expert explains: Cottbuser wins in court against Disney because of inadmissible price increases.

According to a report from www.rbb24.de, the Potsdam Regional Court found that the streaming provider “Disney+” had to change a clause in its terms and conditions that allowed a unilateral price increase. A man from Cottbus defended himself against an unacceptable price increase, which ultimately led to a judgment against Disney. The Brandenburg consumer advice center had taken the case to court and insisted that the clause violated applicable law.

The impact of this ruling could be far-reaching. On the one hand, it shows that consumer rights are protected and that no company can unilaterally increase prices. This could impact other streaming providers who have similar clauses in their terms and conditions. It also demonstrates the importance of consumer organizations and their efforts to defend the interests of consumers.

For the market, this likely means increased awareness of fair and transparent business conditions. Companies may take a closer look at how they communicate price increases and what terms they set in their contracts. This could lead to greater transparency and consumer convenience.

Overall, this ruling shows that consumers are not without rights and that companies can be held accountable for unfair practices.

How www.rbb24.de reported,