Health insurance denies 85-year-old vital rehabilitation after operation!

Health insurance denies 85-year-old vital rehabilitation after operation!

In an unfortunate incident in Zug, an 85-year-old patient experienced internal bleeding due to inadequate medical attention. This situation not only worsened the elderly woman's health situation, but also raised questions about the responsibility of health insurance companies. The Klug health insurance company had originally refused to cover the costs of urgently needed rehabilitation. The case has caused concern among the public and experts because timely medical intervention could have prevented potentially serious consequences, reports Zug newspaper.

The patient's relatives are outraged by the course of events. They emphasize that the health insurance company's decision has put enormous pressure on the family at an already tense moment. Experts criticize the lack of support and warn about the potential risks that can result from such decisions.

Rehabilitation in focus

The health insurance company's refusal to cover rehabilitation measures sheds light on the challenges in the health system. While in many cases a rapid recovery is promoted by early rehabilitation, this appears to have been neglected in this case. Rehabilitation after surgery, such as a knee replacement, is crucial. Early and continuous physiotherapeutic care is important in order to improve mobility and strengthen the muscles. Studies show that on average the rehabilitation period after such procedures is around three weeks Technicians' Health Insurance reported.

The need for such rehabilitation becomes particularly clear when one considers that older patients are at increased risk of complications following surgery. The risks range from impaired wound healing to serious problems such as strokes or deep vein thrombosis.

Criticism of the health insurance companies

The negative attitude of health insurance companies is increasingly being questioned by patients and their families. It is becoming clear that financial considerations in healthcare must not be at the expense of patient health. The decision to cover the costs of rehabilitation should not be made based solely on economic criteria, but rather taking into account the individual needs of the patient.

Unfortunately, the case of the 85-year-old woman is not an isolated case. Those affected repeatedly report similar experiences, which underlines the need for reforms in the healthcare system. The clarifying answers from health insurance companies about their decisions and their impact on patients could trigger a broad discussion about how the quality and accessibility of medical care can be improved.