Who pays if the workshop charges more than the report states? Financial experts clarify

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

According to a report from www.mt.de, if the workshop charges impermissible or excessive items when repairing the car of the person who was injured through no fault of their own, the insurance company of the person responsible must pay for it. This decision by the Bruchsal District Court, Ref: 4 C 163/22, makes it clear that the workshop risk lies with the person responsible or their insurance company. The specific case involved a car traffic accident in which the question of guilt was clearly clarified. A report determined repair costs of a maximum of 5,375.15 euros, while the workshop carrying out the work billed exactly 5,688.57 euros. The other party's insurance company refused to pay the higher amount, which led to legal clarification. The district court decided...

Gemäß einem Bericht von www.mt.de, Rechnet die Werkstatt unzulässige oder überhöhte Positionen bei der Unfallreparatur des Autos des unverschuldet Geschädigten ab, muss die Versicherung des Verursachers dafür aufkommen. Diese Entscheidung des Amtsgerichts Bruchsal, Az: 4 C 163/22, verdeutlicht, dass das Werkstattrisiko beim Verursacher oder dessen Versicherung liegt. Im konkreten Fall ging es um einen Auto-Verkehrsunfall, bei dem die Schuldfrage eindeutig geklärt wurde. Ein Gutachten ermittelte Reparaturkosten in Höhe von maximal 5375,15 Euro, während die ausführende Werkstatt exakt 5688,57 Euro abgerechnet hat. Die Versicherung des Unfallgegners weigerte sich, den höheren Betrag zu begleichen, was zur gerichtlichen Klärung führte. Das Amtsgericht entschied, …
According to a report from www.mt.de, if the workshop charges impermissible or excessive items when repairing the car of the person who was injured through no fault of their own, the insurance company of the person responsible must pay for it. This decision by the Bruchsal District Court, Ref: 4 C 163/22, makes it clear that the workshop risk lies with the person responsible or their insurance company. The specific case involved a car traffic accident in which the question of guilt was clearly clarified. A report determined repair costs of a maximum of 5,375.15 euros, while the workshop carrying out the work billed exactly 5,688.57 euros. The other party's insurance company refused to pay the higher amount, which led to legal clarification. The district court decided...

Who pays if the workshop charges more than the report states? Financial experts clarify

According to a report by www.mt.de,

If the workshop charges impermissible or excessive amounts when repairing the car of the person who was injured through no fault of their own, the insurance company of the person responsible must pay for it. This decision by the Bruchsal District Court, Ref: 4 C 163/22, makes it clear that the workshop risk lies with the person responsible or their insurance company.

The specific case involved a car traffic accident in which the question of guilt was clearly clarified. A report determined repair costs of a maximum of 5,375.15 euros, while the workshop carrying out the work billed exactly 5,688.57 euros. The other party's insurance company refused to pay the higher amount, which led to legal clarification.

The district court decided that in the event of a possible incorrect billing, which the injured party cannot notice, all work must be paid for. It was also determined that the repair was so complex that with a cost increase of only around five percent, nothing should have been noticed.

This decision has far-reaching implications for the collision repair market and the insurance industry. Workshops could take advantage of this ruling to bill excessive costs, since the risk now lies with the person responsible or their insurance company. Insurance companies may need to adjust their assessment procedures and contracts to account for and avoid the costs of such events.

This ruling could also impact other industries where services or repairs are provided to third parties. It emphasizes the importance of transparency and appropriate auditing when issuing invoices to avoid possible incorrect billing.

Read the source article at www.mt.de

To the article