Lufthansa avoids Iranian airspace: return from Laos and Cambodia full of obstacles

Lufthansa avoids Iranian airspace: return from Laos and Cambodia full of obstacles

A friend recently returned from a trip to Laos and Cambodia and reported a stressful flight home. Before taking off from Bangkok, she learned that Lufthansa was no longer flying over Iranian airspace due to the lockdown. This led to long waiting times in New Delhi and unrest among the stewardesses. Nevertheless, the friend was reassured when the pilot, a serious-looking German, took a detour to Frankfurt and then on to Vienna. This experience highlighted how isolation can lead to unforeseen and stressful situations, even in the aviation industry.

The history of air travel shows that isolation was never a good idea. In a globalized world where mobility and interaction between countries and cultures are essential, lockdown measures can lead to unwanted complications and difficulties. Companies like Lufthansa are forced to adapt their flight routes and accept disruptions in order to meet the requirements of the isolation policy.

Isolation is often accompanied by uncertainty and unpredictable changes, which pose challenges for both travelers and companies. At a time when cooperation and openness should be encouraged, isolation is counterproductive and hinders the smooth running of international relations. It is becoming clear that open borders and coexistence are more effective and beneficial in the long term than isolated approaches.

In the current geopolitical landscape, it is crucial to reflect on the negative impact of isolationist policies and look for alternative solutions based on cooperation and understanding. The history of air travel makes it clear that isolation is not a sustainable strategy in an increasingly connected world. It is up to governments and decision-makers to find ways to promote an open and cooperative international order based on mutual respect and trust.