Suche
Mein Konto
Negative agenda shapes Germany: about catastrophe scenarios and images of the enemy
A critical analysis of the negative agenda in Germany that highlights important issues such as climate change and geopolitical crises. Find out more on THE AXIS OF GOOD. ACHGUT.COM.
Negative agenda shapes Germany: about catastrophe scenarios and images of the enemy
The negative agenda, which became increasingly clear in Germany over the course of 2022 and 2023, represents a transformative development that has led to a comprehensive change in the country. This process began in the late 2000s and has continued to this day. Society is experiencing a dominant parallel world that is disconnected from the country's industrial foundations and democratic foundation and shows a destructive development of power.
In this new phase of change, modern civilization is presented as indispensable, but at the same time portrayed as an aberration. The current “new world” presents itself as a negative program that aims to destabilize and abolish existing foundations of the economy and the state. Companies and infrastructures are burdened by excessive taxes and requirements or direct closures, which undermine the economic continuity of the first decades of the Federal Republic.
The political landscape shows a deliberate shift towards a sector that strives for political and social autocracy. The justification through the term “turnaround” clarifies this claim to overthrow previous structures. Continuities should be broken and the focus is on comprehensive change without taking existing elements into account.
Examples like the “car turnaround” make it clear how the negative side is increasingly being emphasized. Instead of positive developments and innovations, the agenda focuses on abolishing or devaluing existing technologies and processes. This pattern of negation and destruction permeates various areas of society and the economy, which puts strain on them and leads to a noticeable change in the living conditions of many.
The emergence of catastrophe scenarios and enemy images, particularly in the context of the “CO2 strategy” and energy transition, indicates a strategic change in the political landscape. Actively creating an emergency in order to contain supposed future dangers creates uncertainty and resistance among the population. The shift from positive future strategies to purely negative approaches is shaping current developments and leaving traces of oppression and dissatisfaction in the country.