Sharp criticism of Jens Spahn's push for stricter sanctions on citizens' money.

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

According to a report from www.t-online.de, citizens' benefit recipients who reject reasonable job offers should be punished more severely according to the government's wishes. Union parliamentary group vice-president Jens Spahn has even suggested a constitutional amendment for stricter sanctions on citizens' money. According to Spahn, people who can work and receive a job offer but do not accept it should essentially no longer receive citizen's benefit. He sees the federal government's planned tightening of sanctions for citizens' money as a first step in the right direction, but it is far from enough. Criticism of Spahn's move came, among others, from the SPD parliamentary group and from Left Party leader Janine Wissler, who described the move as shocking and an attack...

Gemäß einem Bericht von www.t-online.de, Bürgergeldempfänger, die zumutbare Arbeitsangebote ablehnen, sollen nach dem Willen der Regierung schärfer sanktioniert werden. Unionsfraktionsvize Jens Spahn hat sogar eine Verfassungsänderung für schärfere Sanktionen beim Bürgergeld angeregt. Laut Spahn sollen Menschen, die arbeiten können und ein Jobangebot erhalten, dies aber nicht annehmen, im Grunde kein Bürgergeld mehr erhalten. Die von der Bundesregierung geplanten Sanktionsverschärfungen im Bürgergeld wertet er als ersten Schritt in die richtige Richtung, der aber noch lange nicht reiche. Kritik am Vorstoß von Spahn kam unter anderem aus der SPD-Bundestagsfraktion und von Linken-Chefin Janine Wissler, die den Vorstoß als schockierend und einen Angriff …
According to a report from www.t-online.de, citizens' benefit recipients who reject reasonable job offers should be punished more severely according to the government's wishes. Union parliamentary group vice-president Jens Spahn has even suggested a constitutional amendment for stricter sanctions on citizens' money. According to Spahn, people who can work and receive a job offer but do not accept it should essentially no longer receive citizen's benefit. He sees the federal government's planned tightening of sanctions for citizens' money as a first step in the right direction, but it is far from enough. Criticism of Spahn's move came, among others, from the SPD parliamentary group and from Left Party leader Janine Wissler, who described the move as shocking and an attack...

Sharp criticism of Jens Spahn's push for stricter sanctions on citizens' money.

According to a report by www.t-online.de,
The government wants citizens' benefit recipients who reject reasonable job offers to be subject to stricter sanctions. Union parliamentary group vice-president Jens Spahn has even suggested a constitutional amendment for stricter sanctions on citizens' money. According to Spahn, people who can work and receive a job offer but do not accept it should essentially no longer receive citizen's benefit. He sees the federal government's planned tightening of sanctions for citizens' money as a first step in the right direction, but it is far from enough.

Criticism of Spahn's move came, among others, from the SPD parliamentary group and from Left Party leader Janine Wissler, who described the move as shocking and an attack on basic social rights. However, the Federal Cabinet has given the green light for the planned tightening of citizens' benefits. In the future, job centers will be able to completely cancel citizens' benefit for unemployed people for a maximum of two months if those affected consistently refuse to take up work.

These planned tightening measures could have a significant impact on the labor market. On the one hand, they could help motivate more people to accept offered jobs and thus reduce the unemployment rate. On the other hand, the measures could also lead to some recipients of citizenship benefits being pushed into precarious employment in order to avoid sanctions.

The discussion about tightening citizens' money shows that this issue is becoming more polarized and will lead to controversial debates in the future. It remains to be seen how the planned changes will actually affect the labor market and the financial sector.

Read the source article at www.t-online.de

To the article